Why the Long Tail of University Innovation Matters, and Who Is Missing Out
83% of university inventions never reach the market. The economic impact of just the 17% that do is $591 billion per year. What would happen if we could unlock even half of the rest?
Read article →Translation as Infrastructure: A New Model for Repeatable Commercialisation
The bottleneck in university innovation is not science quality: it is the absence of repeatable, standardised infrastructure between discovery and commercial value.
Read article →From IP to Investable: Structuring Early Stage University Opportunities for Capital
Information asymmetry is the primary reason investors cannot access early stage university IP. The QED pathway addresses this through standardised validation and TRL gating.
Read article →University Impact Index: Full Methodology Note
How the six scoring dimensions are constructed, what data sources are used, the friction model explained, and the data limitations that apply across 346 institutions in 13 countries.
Methodology · 12 min read
A Policy-Led Framework for University Technology Transfer and Regional Growth
How PIPE addresses the European Paradox, tackling the persistent gaps between research excellence and commercial outcomes, through standardised evaluation, regional anchoring, and early liquidity.
White Paper · 8 min read
The Disclosure Gap: Invention Dark Matter in University IP
Research shows fewer than half of commercially patentable inventions are ever disclosed to a TTO. We examine the evidence, the structural causes, and what this means for commercialisation measurement.
Research Note · 8 min read
Further insights are published regularly. Subscribe to receive new articles →